On March 18, 1956, Martin Luther King Jr.’s sermon at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama, entitled “When Peace Becomes Obnoxious,” started with a story:
“A few weeks ago, a Federal Judge handed down an edict which stated in substance that the University of Alabama could no longer deny admission to persons because of their race. With the handing down of this decision, a brave young lady by the name of Autherine Lucy was accepted as the first Negro student to be admitted in the history of the University of Alabama. This was a great moment and a great decision. But with the announcement of this decision, ‘the vanguards of the old order began to surge.’ The forces of evil began to congeal. As soon as Autherine Lucy walked on the campus, a group of spoiled students led by Leonard Wilson and a vicious group of outsiders began threatening her on every hand. Crosses were burned; eggs and bricks were thrown at her. The mob jumped on top of the car in which she was riding. Finally, the president and trustees of the University of Alabama asked Autherine to leave for her own safety and the safety of the University. The next day after Autherine was dismissed, the paper came out with this headline: ‘Things are quiet in Tuscaloosa today. There is peace on the campus of the University of Alabama.’”

Peace is not measured by the absence of conflict. Peace is gauged by the respect for differences, the ability to have open, civil dialogue, and the willingness to find common ground and collaborate toward shared goals despite disagreements.

Yes, things were quiet in Tuscaloosa, but the peace on campus, in the words of King, came “at a great price: it was peace that had been purchased at the exorbitant price of an inept trustee board succumbing to the whims and caprices of a vicious mob. It was peace that had been purchased at the price of allowing mobocracy to reign supreme over democracy. It was peace that had been purchased at the price of capitulating to the force of darkness. This is the type of peace that all men of goodwill hate. It is the type of peace that is obnoxious. It is the type of peace that stinks in the nostrils of the Almighty God.”

Leaders play a crucial role in bridging divisiveness and discord in the workplace. Rather than avoiding difficult topics, effective leaders foster open dialogue, model respect, and unite teams around common ground and shared values and purpose. By listening actively and encouraging curiosity, leaders can move conversations from confrontation to connection, transforming disagreement into opportunities for growth.

Emphasizing empathy over partisanship enables leaders to establish a safe environment where all voices are respected, even when perspectives differ. Unifying leaders guide teams to focus on common goals and common ground—such as organizational mission, shared humanity or collective well-being—while also addressing conflict constructively. Through clear communication, accountability, and consistent reinforcement of shared values, leadership can turn workplace polarization into a catalyst for collaboration, innovation, and resilience.

This issue is significant given recent research showing rising incivility related to political differences and social divides in workplaces, which impacts employee morale and can lead to disengagement or turnover. Leaders are now increasingly called upon to foster a culture of respect and safe dialogue on divisive issues. Exploring how organizations can build psychological safety and civil discourse to unite diverse teams remains a matter of continual investigation and vigilance.