Tag Archive for: Articles by David Irvine

Lenny and I continue to walk together every morning.

Lenny and I continue to walk together every morning. He’s aging. Like so many of us, he’s struggling with his hips and joints. His muscle mass is decreasing. He walks more s-l-o-w-l-y. We don’t go as far as we used to.

As a constant companion, he reminds me that the aging process is a persistent journey of surprise and renewal, each stage of life offering a fresh perspective.

Aging is an opportunity to embrace one’s vulnerability more deeply, open our compassionate hearts more fully, and courageously become connected to life through a more intimate relationship with impermanence and loss.​

Wall Of Influence

For those who know my work, I often speak of my Wall Of Influence – the pictures of the 25 most influential people who have helped shape me and make me who I am. The collage of influential people in my life hangs in my office.

Following a recent leadership program I facilitated, one of the participants had some fun with a little craft with her kids where they cut out pictures of the most important people in their life and hung it above their bed. Here’s the picture she sent me:

Navigating Political and Social Polarization in the Workplace: The Role of Leadership as Unifiers

On March 18, 1956, Martin Luther King Jr.’s sermon at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama, entitled “When Peace Becomes Obnoxious,” started with a story:
A few weeks ago, a Federal Judge handed down an edict which stated in substance that the University of Alabama could no longer deny admission to persons because of their race. With the handing down of this decision, a brave young lady by the name of Autherine Lucy was accepted as the first Negro student to be admitted in the history of the University of Alabama. This was a great moment and a great decision. But with the announcement of this decision, ‘the vanguards of the old order began to surge.’ The forces of evil began to congeal. As soon as Autherine Lucy walked on the campus, a group of spoiled students led by Leonard Wilson and a vicious group of outsiders began threatening her on every hand. Crosses were burned; eggs and bricks were thrown at her. The mob jumped on top of the car in which she was riding. Finally, the president and trustees of the University of Alabama asked Autherine to leave for her own safety and the safety of the University. The next day after Autherine was dismissed, the paper came out with this headline: ‘Things are quiet in Tuscaloosa today. There is peace on the campus of the University of Alabama.’”

Peace is not measured by the absence of conflict. Peace is gauged by the respect for differences, the ability to have open, civil dialogue, and the willingness to find common ground and collaborate toward shared goals despite disagreements.

Yes, things were quiet in Tuscaloosa, but the peace on campus, in the words of King, came “at a great price: it was peace that had been purchased at the exorbitant price of an inept trustee board succumbing to the whims and caprices of a vicious mob. It was peace that had been purchased at the price of allowing mobocracy to reign supreme over democracy. It was peace that had been purchased at the price of capitulating to the force of darkness. This is the type of peace that all men of goodwill hate. It is the type of peace that is obnoxious. It is the type of peace that stinks in the nostrils of the Almighty God.”

Leaders play a crucial role in bridging divisiveness and discord in the workplace. Rather than avoiding difficult topics, effective leaders foster open dialogue, model respect, and unite teams around common ground and shared values and purpose. By listening actively and encouraging curiosity, leaders can move conversations from confrontation to connection, transforming disagreement into opportunities for growth.

Emphasizing empathy over partisanship enables leaders to establish a safe environment where all voices are respected, even when perspectives differ. Unifying leaders guide teams to focus on common goals and common ground—such as organizational mission, shared humanity or collective well-being—while also addressing conflict constructively. Through clear communication, accountability, and consistent reinforcement of shared values, leadership can turn workplace polarization into a catalyst for collaboration, innovation, and resilience.

This issue is significant given recent research showing rising incivility related to political differences and social divides in workplaces, which impacts employee morale and can lead to disengagement or turnover. Leaders are now increasingly called upon to foster a culture of respect and safe dialogue on divisive issues. Exploring how organizations can build psychological safety and civil discourse to unite diverse teams remains a matter of continual investigation and vigilance.

Accountability With Heart: Igniting Engagement Through Trust and Ownership

When Brenda took over as the Executive Director of a community outreach, nonprofit organization, she walked into a team that had lost its spark. People were burned out. Staff meetings were tense. Deadlines constantly slipped and a sense of defensiveness hung in the air. At first, Brenda responded the way many leaders do under pressure—by tightening control. She introduced stricter reporting requirements and frequent check-ins. However, instead of improving performance, morale sank further. One afternoon, after a particularly difficult meeting, a colleague quietly took her aside and said, “We don’t need more tightening—we need more trust.”

This was a defining moment for Brenda, a moment that brought her to reach out and connect with me for coaching. “How could I actually make this request real?” she asked me in our first session.

Together we developed a plan – a plan Brenda has given me permission to share in this article. Below is a high-level overview of her implementation:

  1. One-on-one meetings with every one of her key leadership team members. The purpose was not to correct but simply listen. She asked them about their personal values and how they could feel more supported to live their values at work and away from work. They talked about how each person could be more supported to bring their unique abilities and passion more fully to their work. She talked to them about their defining moments growing up that led them to this work, and about why they decided to work here. She explored with them the kind of culture they wanted to work in and what actions would need to happen to start to live the organization’s espoused values.
  2. Assess fit. In these one-on-one meetings (for some she met more than once), Brenda also discussed their experience of being on the leadership team and what needed to happen to create a place people were proud to work. In these conversations she discovered there was one member that simply didn’t fit into the culture. Through exploring and recognizing that his strengths and approach didn’t align with the organization’s values or direction, she helped him create space to thrive elsewhere and moved him on, in order for the team to move forward authentically.
  3. Establish a team charter. Within three months of arriving, Brenda set aside a day with her entire leadership to ensure that they put a priority on the health of that team. To achieve this, they took time to share their values, to get to know people at a more personal level, and pinpoint the expectations team members had of each other. A “team charter” was written, a list of agreements and a process for responding when those agreements were dishonoured. The outcome was a blueprint for creating a team they were committed to, a culture that would enable them to do their best work, and mutual agreements that would inspire a place they were proud and grateful to work in. They also made agreements about how to extend the same kind of process to their respective teams.
  4. Rigid, controlling oversight was replaced with clear expectations and accountability agreements to each other. All this was balanced by genuine care. Self-care became a high priority in the organization to ensure the care they had for their own teams and the clients they served came from overflow, not emptiness.

The results, over a period of a few months, were transformative. People began taking initiative. Energy and engagement improved. Meaningful results began to emerge, signaling that important progress was finally taking shape.

The heart of accountability lies not in control, but in connection. True ownership flourishes when people feel seen, trusted, and valued for the whole of who they are. Trust transforms accountability from a system of enforcement into a relationship of commitment. When leaders embody warmth and integrity, they invite others to bring their best selves forward—not because they have to, but because they want to.

Too often, accountability in organizations is equated with surveillance or blame. But leaders who lead with heart understand that accountability is ultimately about stewardship. It means caring enough to follow through and having the courage to be honest—with oneself and others—about where improvements are needed. It also means creating psychological safety, so feedback is welcomed, not feared.

Ownership, in turn, is the natural outcome of trust. When people take ownership, they stop working for an organization and start working with it. They see success as a shared creation rather than a metric imposed from the top. This kind of engagement can’t be mandated; it must be cultivated. And it grows best in environments where empathy coexists with high standards, and where mistakes are treated as learning moments, not failures.

Brenda’s team rediscovered what many organizations forget: accountability is most powerful when it feels human. And being human means embracing imperfection. Behind every task and deadline is a person who wants to contribute meaningfully. Systems and goals matter, but they are sustained only by relationships built on trust and respect.

Leaders who practice accountability with heart create ripple effects that extend beyond their teams. They model responsibility without rigidity, compassion without complacency, and transparency without fear. Their legacy isn’t just performance—it’s a culture where people thrive because they are trusted to care as deeply as their leaders do.

In the end, engagement doesn’t ignite from pressure; it ignites from purpose. And purpose grows strongest in workplaces where trust and ownership meet—where people are accountable not out of obligation, but out of love for what they are building together.

THE INTEGRATED LEADER: Navigating Individuation with Connection

I was in a tech store the other day buying a new phone. Five people were in line getting assistance from a patient and bright young man behind the counter. A teenager came through the door and walked right past every person in line, completely oblivious to the queue. He abruptly and rudely interrupted the conversation between the sales rep and the customer and asked how much he could get for his phone.

This is an example of a problem that I see today in organizations, families, and practically everywhere I go in public. Some call it entitlement. Others say we are coddled. My parents would have said we’re spoiled.

And it isn’t just generational. We’re all spoiled. We’re spoiled by overabundance. We’re spoiled by convenience. We’re spoiled by being pampered. We’re spoiled by the freedoms we have that we take for granted. And it’s creating a lack of civility, weak character, a deficiency of personal responsibility, and an abundance of anxiety.

Leaders, from parents to presidents, have an opportunity and a responsibility to do something about it. Our work isn’t about going back to the “good old days,” that really weren’t so good. It’s not just about being “tougher” on people or less compassionate. What’s needed today is courageous leadership characterized by the attainment of two fundamental tasks: individuation and connection.

Individuated leaders are leaders who have the capacity to separate themselves from the emotions surrounding them. They are clear about their own principles and vision, independent of others, and don’t get caught up in the anxiety or entitlement behavior of others. They manage their own emotional reactions and remain poised under pressure. Rather than addressing entitlement by indulging it or reacting with rigid rules, they maintain clear boundaries, responsibilities, and consequences. Being individuated is not the same as being individualistic. Self-regulated and persistent in the face of resistance, they are committed to the greater good for all rather than the comfort for the few.

Connected leaders have the capacity to be present and connect with the people in their lives. Connection – the ability to be attuned and emotionally aligned with another – without yielding their principles, pleasing others, or rescuing people from their unhappiness – goes beyond emotional intelligence and empathy. Rather than being lost in emotions, connection means maintaining a grounded, non-anxious, and caring presence. A connected person is willing to be exposed and vulnerable, while risking displeasing those around them.

The Path Forward

Integrating being individuated with connection – called integrated leadership – is about harmonizing and amplifying the two. With clear principles and an unwavering vision, we can build families and organizations that inspire adventure, respect, maturity, and personal responsibility. This synergy allows leaders to maximize their unique gifts while building resilient, innovative, and inclusive organizations. In today’s complex world, the integrated leader—deeply principled, deeply connected—is not just desirable but necessary for transformational change.

Can Organizations Be Too Psychologically Safe?

It depends on how you define psychological safety. If you define it as making things comfortable or easy or secure for people, then yes, you can have too much psychological safety.

I define psychological safety as simply a place where people can be honest.

Honesty means that you can speak accurately about work progress, challenges, and mistakes without hiding or distorting the facts. It means that you can be upfront about your emotions without blame or intimidation. Honesty means owning mistakes, admitting when something goes wrong and taking responsibility for your part. It means being transparent, sharing relevant information rather than withholding it to gain advantage. It means being open to new ideas and suggestions, and challenging outdated processes. Honesty is integrity in action: honoring your agreements, avoiding shortcuts that compromise ethics, and not lying. It means giving credit where credit is due and not stealing the credit for other’s work – or stealing anything from another person for that matter. Honesty often means giving difficult feedback or disagreeing in a way that builds rather than tears down.

You can’t have too much of any of this. Let’s keep working to build psychologically safe places to live and work.